Is Predicting Student Success with AI Truly Fair?
Universities are increasingly using algorithms to predict students’ chances of success. These systems, which analyze data such as demographics, grades, and financial status, aim to identify students who may need additional support like scholarships or academic advising.
However, serious concerns are emerging about fairness. Research shows that these models tend to overestimate the risk of failure for Black and Hispanic students, while projecting overly optimistic success rates for white and Asian students. Many minority students are incorrectly flagged as likely to fail, highlighting a significant equity gap.
Researchers have tested various techniques to reduce bias in these predictive models. Results suggest that methods incorporating fairness principles during the model training process are generally more effective than those that only modify data beforehand. Still, no single solution works equally well across all groups, and tailored approaches are needed depending on the context.
Experts stress that universities must use AI in a transparent, ethical, and equitable manner. Without careful oversight, these technologies risk reinforcing existing inequalities rather than addressing them — turning a tool intended for support into one of exclusion.
Click here for the source
